Home Don't Miss Trump Was Right to Send Federal Law Enforcement Into Those Cities

Trump Was Right to Send Federal Law Enforcement Into Those Cities

726
0
SHARE

American cities are in flames, and the leftist mayors of those cities are siding with those who have been lighting the matches.

President Trump, on numerous occasions, warned those mayors that if they didn’t take action to protect the people of their cities, he would.

They didn’t, so he did.

In recent days, President Trump and Attorney General Barr have sent federal law enforcement agents into places like Portland Oregon, Detroit, and Chicago. The mayors predictably howled protests, but Trump and Barr have not backed down.

On its face, sending in the federal officers and agents seems to be the obvious thing to do to protect citizens who have been abandoned by their radical leftist mayors. However, this action raises federalism issues. Law enforcement is a local and state matter unless federal crimes are being committed.

The leftist mayors and their leftist allies in governor’s mansions, Congress, and, of course, the “news” media, are screaming that the federal government is overstepping its bounds. None of these people have standing to make this argument after decades of thumbing their noses at federalism as they worked tirelessly expand the size and scope of the federal government at the expense of state and local governments.

Nevertheless, as principled conservatives, intellectual honesty requires that we ask whether the federal government has a legitimate basis for involving itself in the violence happening locally in those cities.

The answer is yes, and here’s why:

One obvious area where the federal government has a legitimate law enforcement interest is in protecting federal property. So, for example, it was entirely proper for the FBI to protect that federal courthouse in Portland yesterday. (Teargassing the Marxist mayor while he was participating in the violence was just an added bonus of delicious schadenfreude.)

But in a more general sense, both the actions and the agenda of those perpetrating this violence can reasonably be characterized as domestic terrorism, and in some instances, insurrection, and the federal government has a legitimate role in opposing those kinds of federal crimes.

The Oxford Dictionary definition of terrorism is “the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.”

Can anyone question that what is happening meets this definition? The rioters in these cities are vandalizing and burning buildings, both private and governmental. They are physically attacking police. They are destroying historical monuments. They are destroying businesses. They are murdering children.

And they are committing all of this violence in the pursuit of political aims.

In other words, these people are terrorists. And the mayors who are supporting them are terrorist sympathizers who are supporting terrorism.

The Oxford Dictionary definition of insurrection is “a violent uprising against an authority or government.”

The actions of these terrorists meet this definition as well.

The federal government has not only a right, but a responsibility, to protect American citizens anywhere and everywhere from terrorism and insurrection. This is especially true where the local government officials who should provide the front-line defense against such violence side with the terrorists and insurrectionists.

So, yes, it is entirely proper for the president to send federal law enforcement into these cities. He should continue to do so until these acts of terrorism and insurrection are entirely stopped – and until everyone involved is brought to justice.

That includes the mayors and governors who abandoned the citizens they swore oaths to protect and instead enabled and supported the terrorism and insurrection against them.

Ken Falkenstein

Author: Ken Falkenstein

Ken Falkenstein is the Managing Editor of Committed Conservative and brings a wealth of experience and expertise in public affairs to the job. Ken served in the U.S. Army in the last years of the Cold War as a Russian linguist for military intelligence and the NSA. After leaving the Army, he earned his degree in Secondary Education from Old Dominion University, where he also wrote a popular column in the student newspaper. Upon graduation, Ken worked as a Legislative Aide to two Republican members of the Virginia House of Delegates. Ken also served as Corresponding Secretary of the Young Republican Federation of Virginia, managed several successful political campaigns, and managed governmental affairs operations for a local Realtor association. In 1995, Ken moved to Washington, DC to serve as a Legislative Assistant to Sen. John Warner (R-VA). While working for Sen. Warner, Ken attended law school at night, earning his J.D. with honors from the George Mason University School of Law (n/k/a The Antonin Scalia Law School). Since that time, Ken has practiced as a civil litigation attorney, including serving for three years as an Associate City Attorney for the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia. Ken previously was a contributor to the highly-regarded political blog Bearing Drift and was a weekly co-host of The Steve Batton Radio Program. In 2016, Ken ran unsuccessfully for the Virginia Beach School Board. Ken is also a former President of the Down Syndrome Association of Hampton Roads. Ken now lives outside of Denver, Colorado with his wife, Kim, and three sons, Adam, Dylan, and Joshua, who has Down syndrome. Ken’s writing is motivated and informed primarily by his concern for his kids’ future.